Sarah Van Emst vs Angelina Wirges Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 24 Jun at 11:18 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Van Emst vs A. Wirges

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Emst 1 - 0 Wirges
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sarah Van Emst winning 2 and Angelina Wirges winning 0. The last match between Sarah Van Emst and Angelina Wirges was at the W15 Alkmaar, 24-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Sarah Van Emst getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emst | 1 |
| Wirges | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Alkmaar(06-24-25)
S. V. Emst vs A. Wirges H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.31% (84-53) | Career Total W/L | 49.45% (136-139) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. V. Emst vs A. Wirges Match Preview:
- Considering second serve performance, Emst has a slight edge, winning 39.08% compared to Wirges’ 37.77%.
- Who has been more effective in returning serves recently? Wirges shows a marginal advantage, winning 52.25% of opponents' second serve points against Emst's 52.16%, and is slightly better on first serve returns.
- Under pressure situations such as breakpoints are critical: Wirges saves 47.33% while Emst saves 45.99%, giving Wirges a slight upper hand.
- Overall match performance favors Emst with a win rate of 60.42% over the past year compared to Wirges' 46.3%.
- Assessing performance on their preferred surface, Emst dominates with a 71% win rate on Hard courts compared to Wirges’ 53% on the same surface.
- What about their playing levels in tournaments? Emst demonstrates superiority, winning a higher percentage of matches (62.86%) at lower-tier Futures events compared to Wirges’ 43.24% in Challengers/ITF tournaments.
- Analyzing opponent quality, Emst faced slightly tougher opponents with an average rank of 410.02 versus Wirges' 421.83.
- In terms of deciding sets, Wirges has a better rate, winning 40% compared to Emst's 33% over the last 12 months.
- Regarding break point conversion, Emst leads with a 45.08% conversion rate, whereas Wirges converted 40.21% of chances.
Editorial Prediction (June 24, 2025, UTC):
As we evaluate the match prospects between Wirges and Emst, several factors shine through from their recent statistics. Emst displays a slight edge in second serve performance, which is pivotal in maintaining service games.
While Wirges shows a slight advantage in returning games, Emst has shown better overall match performance and a highly commendable win rate on Hard courts, which is both players’ preferred surface. Additionally, Emst's successes at Futures events suggest a higher consistency at lower-tier tournaments.
Despite Wirges’ superior ability to handle pressure and decide sets, Emst’s stronger break point conversion reflects an ability to capitalize on critical moments more efficiently during matches.
Given these insights, Emst seems to have a comprehensive edge across key aspects and is expected to be the likely winner in this upcoming tennis match.
Sarah Van Emst vs Angelina Wirges Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. V. Emst vs A. Wirges H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:4:13 | Average Match Time | 1:4:13 |
| 63% (30/48) | 1st Serve % | 59% (20/34) |
| 67% (20/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 35% (7/20) |
| 56% (10/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 14% (2/14) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 74% (25/34) | Return Points Win % | 38% (18/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. V. Emst Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 4-6 10-3 | ||
QF | L | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-0 | ||
Q3 | W | 4-6 7-5 10-0 | ||
A. Wirges Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 7-5 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(5) 6-3 | ||

S. V. Emst vs A. Wirges Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.31% (84/53) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.45% (136/139) |
| 58.99% (187/130) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.05% (310/322) |
| 54.63% (1598/1327) | Games Win/Loss | 50.24% (2940/2912) |
| 68.63% (35/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.78% (38/34) |
| 57.32% (47/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.25% (69/74) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.33% (29/31) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 160 | Aces Total | 314 |
| 0.35 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 496 | Total Double Faults | 1078 |
| 1:35:12 | Average Match Time | 1:33:29 |
| 131.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 464.72 |
| 56% (4580/8133) | 1st Serve % | 53% (8742/16487) |
| 63% (2894/4580) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (5282/8742) |
| 45% (1611/3553) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3470/7745) |
| 49% (535/1093) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1006/2096) |
| 48% (3910/8151) | Return Points Win % | 46% (7523/16183) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60.38% (32/21) | Challenger W/L | 46.77% (87/99) |
| 62.65% (52/31) | Futures W/L | 55.06% (49/40) |
| 60% (80/133) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (135/272) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 58% (15/26) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (32/52) |
| 51% (23/45) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (45/83) |
| 88% (77/68) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (134/116) |
| 12% (77/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (134/18) |
| 25% (60/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (141/20) |